I’ve two networks, and a handful of computer systems.
I need to repair the central level of failure.
5 Servers, working linux (ubuntu):
All servers have one community interace:
C, which has two interfaces:
C is the one server linked to each networks, and it’s the central router between the 2 networks, it has a devoted interface for every community, and ipv4 forwarding enabled.
Here’s a diagram:
^^ this appears to work fairly effectively, however i need to have some type of failover or loadbalancing of visitors by including one other central router.
Wouldn’t it be potential so as to add one other linux server, say server
D, additionally with two community interfaces, to carry out the identical operate as server
I would love server
D to be a failover or steadiness the visitors one way or the other, and determining this half is tough for me.
I’m imagining that I can add a secondary path to the identical community, and add a metric or weight the route on a node, one way or the other?
Here’s a diagram, which I think about the answer might seem like:
Wouldn’t it be potential to configure this to both load-balance the visitors between server C and D, or would there be some type of “failover” possibility?
Listed below are some issues that I’m curious about, however I’m not extremely expert in networking eventualities, and I’m not certain which might be essentially the most becoming answer:
ip route add through metric desire
eBGP(whats the distinction?)
I want to repair the central level of failure (server C), and duplicate the function of that router. What could be essentially the most sensible method?